Welcome to my personal webpage! Iβm Anton Boltachka, a PhD student in Economics at Bocconi University. Previously, I worked as a Scientific Assistant in the team of Elliott Ash at ETH Zurich. On this page, I share insights into my research, academic journey, and a bit more about myself.
MEDIA BIAS AND CLIMATE CHANGE SKEPTICISM,
joint with Elliott Ash, Sergio Galletta, and Matteo Pinna, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (revise and resubmit)
View abstract
This study examines the impact on climate change attitudes of exposure to Fox News Channel (FNC), the top-rated U.S. cable television channel known for its conservative bias. Our findings indicate a statistically significant shift towards climate change skepticism and a decline in support for climate change mitigation policies. The findings remain robust across multiple empirical methodologies, including addressing the endogeneity of viewership through an instrumental variable (IV) approach, and are consistent across a variety of survey datasets. Our research adds significant value to the existing literature on media's influence on beliefs, highlighting the role media plays in guiding societal discourse and comprehension.
The Graph
Working Papers
RACE-RELATED RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS: VOLUME, CONTENT AND PUBLICATION INCENTIVES, joint
with Arun Advani, Elliott Ash, David Cai, and Imran RasulView abstract
Issues of racial justice and economic inequalities across racial and ethnic groups have risen to the top of public debate. Economistsβ ability to contribute to these debates is based on the body of race-related research. We study the volume and content of race-related research in economics and examine the implicit incentives to produce such work. We do so for a corpus of 225,000 economics publications from 1960 to 2020 to which we apply an algorithmic approach to classify race-related work, and construct paths to publication for 22,000 NBER and 10,000 CEPR working papers posted over the last few decades. We present three new facts. First, since 1960 less than 2% of economics publications have been race-related, with such work being balkanized into a few felds and largely absent from many others. There is an uptick in such work in the mid 1990s. Among the top-5 journals this is driven by the AER, QJE and the JPE. Econometrica and the REStud have each cumulatively published fewer than 15 race-related articles since 1960. Second, on content, while over 50% of race-related publications in the 1970s focused on Black individuals, by the 2010s this had fallen to 20%. There has been a steady decline in the share of race-related research on discrimination since the 1980s, with a rise in the share of studies on identity. Finally, irrespective of feld, race- related working papers do not have worse publication outcomes compared to non race-related working papers, in terms of publication likelihood, quality of publication, publication lags and citations. Hence conditional on working papers being produced, the publications process provides little disincentive to work on race-related issues. We discuss policy implications stemming from our fndings on economistsβ ability to contribute to debates on race and ethnicity in the economy.
Listening to the Dictators: How Do Narratives of Authoritarian Leaders Shape Policy?
[ββββββββββ] 15%
Email Philosophy
Please use my academic email (anton.boltachka@phd.unibocconi.it) for all academic-related matters. For urgent issues (though most matters are typically non-urgent) or long-term discussions, feel free to contact me via my personal email (aboltachka@gmail.com).
This page will be updated regularly with new research, publications, and insights. Thank you for visiting!